Home

 

 Introduction

 

Articles

 

Site Contents

 

What's New

 

Contact

 

Links

 

"Where are you at on this map"
article

Hill Wilson Star Map

“Where are YOU on this map?”

Hill-Wilson Star Map
By Steve Pearse
Welcome to the Hill-Wilson Star Map web-site. For years I believed that Marjorie Fish’s Zeta Reticuli interpretation of Betty Hill’s star map could be theoretically right, and that they might actually come from Zeta Reticuli as she postulated. But my opinion was about to shift dramatically as newer and better information suddenly presented itself, as once that I had the time to thoroughly investigate this new information; and then compare it to her version of the star map, it became obvious that she was dead wrong.
In late 2000 a phenomenal discovery took taken place that has changed everything that we have been lead to believe, and this is a dramatic story of how this new information from a relatively unknown CE-5 case challenges the Scientific Communities position about the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis and Marjorie Fish’s Zeta Reticuli Interpretation of Betty Hill’s star map theory on where the alien species called the “Greys” really come from. If there was a word that could best describe the turn of events that have taken place, then that word would be serendipity. Serendipity is the effect by which one accidentally discovers something fortunate, especially while looking for something else entirely.
According to M.K. Stoskopf, “it should be recognized that serendipitous discoveries are of significant value in the advancement of science and often present the foundation for important intellectual leaps of understanding.” This amazing clue was found on Kay Wilson’s web site: www.alienjigsaw.com while searching for other UFO information, and is the personal experience of Erik Wilson, Kay’s husband. The combination of the Betty and Barney Hill case with Kay and Erik Wilson’s CE-5 case is the origin of the Hill-Wilson Star Map’s name.
Discovered quite by accident, it contains vital clues that were then used to find what we now believe to be their true origins. This newly discovered CE-5 case gave highly specific information in an unprecedented revelation in a one on one conversation about where they come from. The conversation was so specific that the being ended up telling him to look at a well known feature in the constellation Ursa Major in the Northern Hemisphere, then as the conversation continued on, the being mentioned specific reference points to look for to locate their star. Without realizing it the being has unwittingly gave away the location of a key feature of the star map, clues that would eventually lead to this discovery years later.
In this astounding conversation about where they come from, one of the key references made during this conversation is a “Triangle” which was later investigated and proven to be remarkable match to the famous triangle in Betty Hill’s star map, thus allowing me to formally connect these two cases together. Seeing for the first time that the triangle was a perfect isosceles triangle and an exact match to the triangle in Betty Hill’s star map, it allowed me to further deduce that Betty Hill’s star map was actually Earth based and my final determination was that the star map was fairly accurate as drawn with minor corrections. This time they are essentially showing us where they come from, which makes all the difference in the world. In both of these cases the conversation is about the location of their home star, the information meshes, and now these two cases are connected together like a puzzle piece showing us the way home. The most shocking aspect was the true location of Sol within the star map.
My original  intend of this pioneering investigation was to build a bridge to the scientific world, in hope that might be able present a solid case that could help solve the UFO phenomenon, and beat the scientific community to the punch by finding a second Earth, capable of hosting a habitable planet with life, and proving once and for all that the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis is the only logical explanation that can adequately explain the UFO phenomenon beyond a reasonable doubt that will end the debate about the validity of visitation to our world by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations with the technology and knowledge to travel through interstellar space. In time we will have the same capabilities when we finally admit that contact has already taken place.
The Clue of the Century
In July of 1993, my husband Erik had an amazing alien encounter while we were living in Portland, Oregon. I was very careful to write down exactly what my husband said because an alien being specifically told him where he - or they –were from. Erik remembered his experience immediately - no hypnosis was used.
Erik’s conversation with a Grey is as follows:
"We go on the deck. I ask him, 'Are you from the Pleiades?' The Being adamantly replies, 'No.' I ask him where he is from. We look in the sky to see the Big Dipper. He says, 'See the Ursa Major?' I reply “Yes”. The Being then tells me, 'The star cluster to the right and below. The one with the triangle to the left and the little stars in between...we're from that one. “The fourth planet from our sun."

They’re directing our attention to the Big Dipper in the Constellation Ursa Majoris as a visual starting point to find their home star. The Being went on with further detail, as it specifically mentions the presence of a triangle as it says: “The star cluster to the right and below the one with the triangle to the left and the little stars in between.” as it spoke to Erik Wilson, giving him directions on how to find the location of their star. I have found their star, and it is Not Zeta Reticuli!
The triangle is an integral and key feature of the star map, and with the realization that this new challenge to Fish’s Zeta Reticuli theory would be an up hill battle, I had to re-examine fish’s star map interpretation and her selection of triangle stars; knowing full well that it would obviously give life to a new heated debate about the Pro & Cons of Marjorie Fish’s ZR theory. I really had to do my home work to show beyond a reasonable doubt that her ZR theory was wrong and that they do not come from Zeta Reticuli as she claimed. The location and visual prominence of the triangle is the key issue.
There are several important quotes attributed to Marjorie Fish that are of critical importance to this discussion, so we will focus our attention on the background support data used in the promotion of the ZR Theory. This specifically involves her comments about the triangle as a key feature of the star map.
Fish quote: It wasn't until the updated 1969 Gliese Catalogue of Nearby Stars became available to Marjorie that the last three stars with connecting lines as well as the stars in the triangle could be pinned down and identified in the Constellation Fornax. The triangle stars are identified by the Gliese numbers of 86.1, 95, and 97. Quote: “With that specific star data, Marjorie had all the proof she needed to confirm that Betty's map could only have been drawn at the time as the result of contact with extraterrestrials!”
According to Fish:

“No astronomer on Earth could have known that the triangle of background stars existed in its present geometric design - only UFOnauts coming toward our system from the Constellation Reticulum could have known those three shining stars existed in that position and would have plotted them in on their star map for visual orientation.”
The statement that no astronomer on Earth could have known that the triangle of background stars existed is absolutely false. Stars have many identifying numbers, and the Gliese Catalogue of Stars is one of the many numbers used to identify a star. Gl 86.1 has 19 different identifiers’ and Gl 138 (Zet2) for example has even more at 32 identifiers’. What is significant in this case is their Henry Draper number (HD). All three of Fish’s triangle stars have HD numbers. The Henry Draper Catalogue (HD) is an astronomical star catalog that was published between the years 1918 and 1924, giving spectroscopic classifications for 225,300 stars. Oops..!
Her triangle stars are HD13435, HD14412, and HD14802 putting her claims that no astronomer on Earth could have known that the triangle stars existed in its present geometric design in serious trouble in more than one way. This is an error saying that no astronomer could have known about them and I’d have to blame her science advisors who should have caught this. Trouble continues to mount as we closely examine the ZR theory as we will soon see!
In 1974 Mark Steggart also made a very interesting comment about Fish’s ZR theory noting that “The fact that measurements of most of the stars in question can only be made at the relatively poor equipped southern hemisphere observatories accounts for the less reliable data. The data on some of the stars may not be accurate enough for us to make definitive conclusions.” This is where the problem starts. There is no dispute that the Gliese catalog was one of the best available data sources at that time, so the real problem stems from the advancement in our knowledge base to what was known 35 years ago. Stanton Friedman the primary spokesman also acknowledged the problem saying that “The distance data was in pretty poor shape back then, you look at five different star catalogs and you get five different distances.” I have to admit he’s absolutely right!
Since 1974 the advances in astronomy have grown by leaps and bounds, and much of what we thought we knew has turned out to be wrong. The passage of time hasn’t helped Marjorie Fish’s interpretation of the star map, and the end result is the fact that Fish’s star map has simply failed to keep pace with the science of astronomy, thus leaving major holes in her star map interpretation. Major discrepancies have come to light regarding Fish’s positions number #13 and #15 which has now been proven to be much farther away, and out of bounds of Fish’s display model “Psyche” that proclaimed that all of the stars were within 55 light years of Sol in the direction of Zeta Reticuli. It was a valiant effort on her part to try to break the secrets of the star map, and I admire her for her efforts; but now we must go forward without her because today’s science is tolling a bell on her work.
The distance of Gl 86.1 was previously thought to be 41.30 light years in 1969, and now HIPPARCOS has determined that the correct distance is actually 183.651 light years which puts this star far outside the boundary of Fish's model "Psyche" that thought all the stars were within 55 light-years of the sun in the direction of Zeta Reticuli. We still have visibility issues too since this star is a very faint 7.10 Vmag star. Neither is it in the close position that Fish originally thought, nor is it a bright and shining star as she proclaimed in her dissertation so many years ago. This is simply science fact.
Position #13 Gl 86.1(Bottom left Fish triangle)
Constellation: Fornax
Hemisphere: Southern
Star name: GL 86.1
HIP: 10164
DM: CD -28 694
HD 13435
RA: 2h 10m 41.66s
Dec: -28° 13'09.3"

To better understand the question of visibility or I should say the lack of visibility you can see the problem for yourself here:
Click here Aim point RA: 2h 10m 41s Dec: -28°
Another major problem for Fish's Triangle -Kappa Fornacis (GL97) one of the closest 46 stars list was thought to be 42 light years distance in 1969, today HIPPARCOS has put this star at 71.49 ly. This now puts its true position outside of the boundary of Fish’s model "Psyche" also, and closeness to the front of Fish's 3D display model called Psyche. GL 95 the remaining star was thought to be 45 light years in 1969 and has been subsequently corrected to 12.68pc (41.33ly) a slight improvement distance wise. One star cannot form a triangle.
This effectively destroys the placement of Fish's Triangle as being part of the star map. Ironically Gl 97 has a better chance of hosting a habitable planet than most of Fish’s primary selections. Today the reality is the fact that her ZR theory no longer has a triangle, which simply compounds the problem. The triangle is a key feature of the star map. The importance of the triangle is the fact that it’s an integral part of the star map and a critical element. It takes on even more importance because Betty Hill is quoted saying that “these triangle stars appeared quite prominent.” It’s true that the triangle is not a primary star, and not one of the 6 trade or 6 expedition destinations, but its positional relationship and position within the star map is of great importance which cannot be ignored.
If you look at Betty Hill’s star map one can clearly see that Positions #10 and # 3 falls between the upper portion of the triangle and the two lower bottom stars of the triangle. Fish’s triangle was based upon information from 1969 that has been proven to be unreliable and simply wrong. The bottom line to this story is the fact that Fish’s Zeta Reticuli theory doesn’t have a valid triangle anymore; which has always been a key feature of the star map. So the question now is can we really continue to believe that they come from Zeta Reticuli? Perhaps not. So I ask, is position #10 directly to the right of the triangle or not ?
Do they come from Zeta Reticuli?
Marjorie Fish claimed that she had all the proof she needed to confirm that Betty's map could only have been drawn at the time as the result of contact with extraterrestrials is essentially correct as far as the abduction of Betty and Barney Hill is concerned. But the triangle in her her ZR interpretation of the star map is a mistaken assumption, because the stars are not really where she said they were. The answer is obviously NO, because the true location of the triangle has been discovered, proving that none of the stars shown in the star map are in the Southern Hemisphere. The “base star” concept is a fallacy.
There is a process of arriving at some degree of probability, and logic dictates that we equate the statement that the triangle stars appear to be quite prominent to their actual naked eye magnitudes as seen on Earth’s celestial sphere. Saying that the triangle stars appeared to be quite prominent is a clear inference to the logical conclusion that naked-eye magnitudes of the triangle stars is an important consideration when we look at the star map. The bottom line is that it should be visible according to our standard stellar magnitudes, and be able to live up to Betty Hill’s testimony calling them quite prominent.
The fact is that Marjorie Fish’s triangle has always been a very poor rendition of what Betty Hill drew, and now we know that it has never existed as portrayed by Marjorie Fish in her interpretation of the star map. Ultimately, in the end it’s Erik’s conversation that really gives us superior information about where they come from.
The real triangle is below the Big Dipper, and as a courtesy to the readers we are now giving everyone the link to see the triangle that I found. When you look at the triangle-you'll understand the magnitude of the shock that I felt when I first gazed upon the real triangle in Betty Hill’s star map.

Triangle :Aim point RA: 12h 26m 32s Dec: +35°14'59"

Even though I was confident that I was right, I still had to thoroughly examine Fish’s Zeta Reticuli theory to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was wrong, and once I started to take a hard look at her work I was really shocked to see how she went about the task of identifying and using the two large nickel sized stars as base-stars and the start point in her Zeta Reticuli Interpretation.

Betty Hill drew the map in 1964 under posthypnotic suggestion given to her by Dr. Benjamin Simon. It was to be drawn only if she could remember it accurately, and she was not to pay attention to what she was drawing -- which puts it in the realm of automatic drawing. This is a way of getting at repressed or forgotten material and can result in unusual accuracy.

A verbatim quote from Betty Hill while under hypnosis:

            "I walked across the room and I leaned against the table, and looked at it. And it was a map--it was an oblong map. It wasn’t square. It was a lot wider than it was long. And there were all these dots on it. And they were scattered all over it."

Now where do they come from and where are YOU on this map?


The answer: We are the lower of the two large nickel sized stars           ^

The star map has two very large nickel sized stars. Star (A) for Alien, and (B) for Betty. Betty has asked the alien, Hey where do you come from? And as a quick retort, he then asks Betty to identify where Sol was at. To make a long story short, she didn't know. She had a 50/50 chance of guessing correctly, but she didn’t offer any answer to the challenge. The answer is that Sol our sun is the lower and obviously B. Their star (A) the upper nickel sized star with traffic trade lines going off to multiple worlds is obviously their home star. When you look at the heavy banding between them, it’s very clear that this is a major trade route; and Sol is the primary destination. The layout of the star map is very precise, and every position identified interlocks with one another; proving that the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis is for real. The center of the star map is in the constellation Ursa Major. We are in orbit around the lower of the two large nickel sized stars, and we here on Earth see the rest of the star map positions in the Northern Hemisphere. They can’t be seen from the Southern Hemisphere. The Hill-Wilson star map is plotted out to their respective Right Ascension and Declination coordinates. The star map that Betty Hill was shown were three dimensional and the heavy banding between the two large nickel sized stars represents the dimension of depth.

Now, let’s get to the exciting part by identifying the real location of where the “Greys” home world is at. Based upon the information that the being had given to Erik Wilson I’m now identifying their home world as 20 Leo Minor a 6.5 Billion year old spectral type G3 star 48.6 light years away from us. The Harvard Revised identifier number for this star is HR3951.

            Their star is a metal rich star, and it has all of the scientific requirements to host a habitable planet according to Maggie Turnbill, one of the world‘s leading Astrophysicists.  In a study that she did in 2003 called the Sun Life List, she selected a group of stars that had all the criteria of host a habitable planet. Screened so tight that she said that they would “satisfy the harshest critic in their ability to host a habitable planet.” Per Erik Wilson’s conversation they come from the fourth planet this system. The orbit of their planet would put them at approximately 115 Million miles from their sun. There is a distinct possibility that the third planet might be habitable. It’s a fluid situation as new information has came in indicating that the Eta-Earth Survey (October/2011) has found a planet around this star (1.08 mass of Earth), and I’m anxiously waiting to hear the technical information about the orbit of this planet. Finding a second Earth is the Holy Grail in the scientific community, and saying we told you so is on the tip of my tongue…

            My book ‘Set Your Phaser to Stun’ was released on September 19th, 2011 to commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the Betty and Barney Hill case. It is currently available on the Kindle reader and published in book form by Xlibris. The UFO books written today tend to tell anecdotal stories; interesting tales that lack critical scientific information that could help establish better support to the UFO community.


While I have never seen a UFO and was very much aware of the fact that very few writers have provided any solid scientific or technical content in the books that they have written, so for me this was a unique opportunity to build a bridge to the scientific community by writing a very sound rebuttal to the continued insistance that the study of UFO phenomenon has nothing to contribute to society. Their mindset has been stridently negative and we have been in the dark ages for far too long, and its time to open the door to this brave new world.  I did what the scientific community has refused to do, and that was to simply listen to their point of view, and be willing to devote my time and energy to intensely researching this new evidence.

Home Introduction | Articles | | Site Contents  | What's New | Contact |Links

Set Your Phaser to Stun... (Kindle Edition)
Steve Pearse (Author),
Kay Wilson (Foreword)
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004UC531K

WWW.MCDCNetInnovations.com